On September 11th, 2001, I was happily settling in to a year's residency at the
New York Public Library's Center for Scholars and Writers (directed by Peter
Gay). My intention was to work on the history of New York City in the twentieth
centurya follow-up volume to Gotham: A History of New York City to 1898
(Oxford University Press), which I had co-authored with Ted Burrows. I had just
plunged into the Second World War and was reading about U-Boat attacks in New
York harbor when the World Trade Center was destroyed. In the following days I
wrote an op/ed piece for the New York Times City Section, in which I tried to
provide some perspective on the shattering events. I noted that our city had
experienced other disasters over the course of its 400-year history, and not only
survived them but often turned catastrophe into opportunity, emerging stronger
than before.
Over the ensuing months, I participated in the swirl of discussions about how the
wounded city should react to its current crisis. The Gotham Center for New York
City History, of which I am Director, organized public conversations that set
present events in historical context. The inaugural Gotham History Festival,
which took place in October 2001, brought thousands of people together to
celebrate the city's past and ponder its future. Mayor Rudolph Giuliani issued
his first post-attack proclamation declaring the Festivalwhich took place
at our home base at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York and in
venues all around townto be New York City History Week. Afterwards the New
York City Council hailed the Festival for having been a useful part of the
healing process. Similarly, the Gotham Center (ably generaled by Associate
Director Suzanne Wasserman) deployed our website (www.gotkamcenter.org') to
provide temporal perspectives and a platform for ongoing discussion about the
city's plight and prospects, and developed a curriculum for the public school
system, called New York Challenged, to set the tragedy in a historical continuum.
As I shifted from reading about the forties to writing about our own time, it
became clear that a wide range of organizations and individuals were
energetically churning out ideas not just to repair or rebuild our city, but to
improve it. I decided I might make a useful contribution by summarizing and
making accessible the burgeoning number of proposals for future action, and
situating those initiatives in the city's history. Naturally the result, written
in the heat of a troubled moment, is less a historical account than an
intervention in an urgent public debate. I hope and expect that this collective
conversationand subsequent collective actionwill revivify New York,
for all of its citizens.
Brooklyn, New York
July 2002